A Catholic priest serving in the diaspora, Reverend Father Prince Chidi Philip, has issued a strong warning to couples planning to marry, stressing the importance of checking their genotypes before tying the knot.
Newsonspot reports that in a detailed message shared on Facebook, Father Philip described genotype testing as a non-negotiable requirement, stating that he would never officiate a marriage where both partners have the AS genotype. According to him, such combinations pose serious health risks to future children, particularly the likelihood of sickle cell disease.
He explained that couples with an AS-AS genotype combination risk giving birth to children who may suffer lifelong health complications associated with sickle cell disease – a condition he described as preventable through informed decision-making.
“AS + AS lovers must consider not only the welfare of their unborn children but also the impact on friends, families, and communities who may have to bear the burden of avoidable suffering,” the priest wrote.
Father Philip further emphasized that love and prayer alone are not sufficient foundations for marriage without wisdom and responsibility.
“Love alone is not enough. Prayer alone is not enough. Faith without wisdom is not holiness; it is recklessness,” he stated, urging couples to balance spiritual commitment with practical health considerations.
The priest advised couples to prioritize genotype testing early in their relationships, before emotional attachment deepens or formal commitments such as engagement and family introductions are made. He stressed that early testing protects not only future children but also families and society at large.
His warning comes amid continued efforts by medical experts and health advocates to raise awareness about sickle cell disease in Nigeria and beyond, with genotype testing widely recommended as a key preventive measure.
Father Philip’s firm stance has since sparked widespread discussion online, with many praising his blend of spiritual guidance and medical responsibility, while others have debated the balance between personal choice and preventive care.
